Laura Serrant
Department of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
Published Date: 2023-08-10Laura Serrant*
Department of Health and Wellbeing, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
Received date: July 10, 2023, Manuscript No. IPJCND-23-17864; Editor assigned date: July 13, 2023, PreQC No. IPJCND-23-17864 (PQ); Reviewed date: July 27, 2023, QC No. IPJCND-23-17864; Revised date: August 03, 2023, Manuscript No. IPJCND-23-17864 (R); Published date: August 10, 2023, DOI: 10.36648/2472-1921.9.8.70
Citation: Serrant L (2023) Disease Occurrence and Nutritional Factors at the Population Level in Nutritional Epidemiology. J Clin Nutr Die Vol.9 No.8: 070.
Dietary and nutritional factors are examined in relation to disease occurrence at the population level in nutritional epidemiology. The study of the connection between nutrition and health is a relatively new area of medical research known as nutritional epidemiology. It is a relatively new branch of epidemiology that is becoming increasingly relevant to current health issues. Because it is difficult to accurately measure diet and physical activity, nutrition may have received less attention in epidemiology than other risk factors for disease. Nutritional epidemiology employs nutritional science knowledge to better comprehend human nutrition and the fundamental underlying mechanisms. Information from nutrition science is also used to create clinical, case-control and cohort nutritional epidemiological studies and interventions. In order to investigate the connection between diet and disease, nutritional epidemiological methods have been developed.
The development of dietary recommendations, including those tailored specifically for the prevention of certain diseases, conditions and cancers, is influenced by these studies' findings, which have an impact on public health. Western researchers contend that nutritional epidemiology ought to be a fundamental part of the training for all health and social service professions due to its increasing relevance and past accomplishments in enhancing public health worldwide. However, it is also argued that nutritional epidemiological studies produce unreliable results because they rely on the role of diet in health and disease, a measurement error-prone exposure. The application of nutritional epidemiology data has resulted in significant social and scientific advancements since then. The relationship between diet and disease has been studied using epidemiological methods for centuries, but they were not considered definitive. The reliability of the data was made possible by advancements in the measurement techniques used to measure dietary exposures. Since models of causation now include genetic risk factors, nutritional epidemiology has become increasingly multidisciplinary. The study of the role that nutrition plays in health and disease throughout the lifespan is the focus of the multidisciplinary field of study known as nutritional science. Both nutritional epidemiology and nutritional science share knowledge about how nutrients, food and the human body interact with one another. To comprehend nutritional epidemiology, one must be familiar with the fundamentals of nutrition science. In order to offer the general public preventative measures, the two fields investigate the connections between diseases and diet. Food regulations and dietary guidelines are also based on research in nutritional science. Society has become more aware of the connections between food consumption and well-being thanks to nutrition science knowledge. The findings that link trans-fat consumption to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and the consumption of fish during pregnancy to a reduced risk of preterm birth are examples of the successes that nutritional science has contributed to. Other examples of these findings include those linking vitamin C deficiency to scurvy and folate deficiency to a higher risk of neural tube defects. With more and more scientific evidence and information about these occurrences, there are more opportunities for effective prevention and intervention.
Nutrition-related discoveries are based on epidemiological studies of nutrition. The studies examine the aetiology of chronic disease and the connection between nutrition and health. They give a complete picture of how diet affects or keeps people's health and well-being in good or bad shape. Because exposures are subject to measurement errors and variation, their ability to be reliably and accurately measured is a major point of contention. To develop interventions and policies that will be implemented for the public's health, nutritional epidemiological study designs are necessary to establish a definitive relationship between diet and disease. Ecological, cross-sectional, cohort, case-control, clinical and community trails are examples of applicable study designs that fall under observational and experimental investigations. In observational studies, exposures are only observed without intervention, whereas in experimental studies, researchers have control over assigning exposures. As a result, experimental studies can provide more convincing evidence for the effect of exposure on outcome, which would not be possible in an observational study because exposure could be harmful. However, observational studies are more cost-effective and easier to carry out. Because diet-related diseases develop over time, observational studies are able to detect rare or unusual findings over long periods of time, which would otherwise burden subjects and be costly in experimental studies. Experimental studies can be used in nutritional epidemiology to draw causal connections between dietary exposures and health outcomes; however, there are ethical considerations for some diet-disease relationships. As a result, nutritional policy and procedure decisions are guided by findings from a variety of sources to guarantee validity, reliability and accuracy. The question and the design of the study determine the measure of exposure. It can be measured on individuals or populations in the past or present, either objectively or subjectively. This refers to things like food, including nutrients and non-nutrients and the social environment in nutritional epidemiological studies. The outcomes are used to measure the effect of these exposures. Under either continuous or discrete variables, the outcome is frequently referred to as the disease state, anthropometric or physiological state, or both in nutritional epidemiology. Nutritional epidemiological research aims to provide scientific evidence to support an understanding of the role of nutrition in health and disease prevention. It is essential to address the factors that affect food after consumption as well as those that affect food supply, such as quality, quantity and balance. The first step in epidemiological research is to come up with a specific, attainable and relevant purpose for the study as well as a target population. The selection and proper application of a method that measures exposure and outcome are the next steps, which are followed by extensive analysis. To ensure the reliability of the relationship evaluated, exposure and the desired outcome are measured. The results of studies will be used to improve health care if they are well-designed, have a solid foundation, detailed methodology and are guided by ethical principles. Knowledge of previous and current literature is required for each step. In different situations, the various nutritional epidemiological study designs have advantages and disadvantages.