Manjeet Singh1*, Rashmi Kulkarni2, Pawan Kumar Singh3, Kasthuri Rangarajan4, Anik Chakraborty5 and Daksh Yadav1

1Department of Medicine and Surgery, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India

2Department of Quality Management, Sri Aurobindo Medical Science and Post Graduate Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

3Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana

4Department of Healthcare, National Accreditation Board for Hospitals (NABH), Chennai, India

5Department of Community Medicine, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India

*Corresponding Author:
Manjeet Singh Department of Medicine and Surgery, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India E-mail: mjetsingh@gmail.com

Received: 19-Aug-2022, Manuscript No. IPJCND-22-14355; Editor assigned: 22-Aug-2022, PreQC No. IPJCND-22- 14355(PQ); Reviewed: 05-Sep-2022, QC No IPJCND-22-14355; Revised: 12-Sep-2022, Manuscript No. IPJCND-22-14355(R); Published: 19-Sep-2022

Citation: Singh M, Kulkarni R, Singh PK, Rangarajan K, Chakraborty A, et al. (2022) Nutritional Status Assessment of Patients Recovered From Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). J Clin Nutr Diet Vol. 8 No. S1:03

Visit for more related articles at

Introduction

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an ongoing pandemic outbreak leading to deaths worldwide. Furthermore, SARSCoV- 2 can attack the mucous epithelium and cause gastrointestinal symptoms, further impairing the nutritional status [1]. COVID-19 illness negatively impacts nutritional status on many levels; increasing nutritional requirements induced by pyrexia, sepsis, dyspnoea, and reducing nutritional intake due to excessive coughing, dysphagia, dysgeusia, chronic fatigue, poor appetite, and food access issues [2]. Various studies have been conducted to identify themes regarding the importance of nutritional care, as they are fundamental and should be integrated into pathways for the rehabilitation of patients recovering from COVID-19. To provide a scientific evaluation of the impact of COVID-19 on the nutritional study, we conducted a prospective observational study. To our knowledge, this study will immensely help assess the nutritional status of COVID-19- positive patients.

It can evolve into pneumonia requiring hospitalization up to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) managed in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Infectious respiratory diseases lead to malnutrition, which can worsen the prognosis. In the COVID-19 population, studies have reported that about half of the patients describe olfactory and gustatory dysfunction. These disorders may contribute to a reduction in nutritional intake. Li et al. showed a high prevalence of malnutrition (52.7%) in a cohort of 182 elderly patients with COVID-19 [3]. Our study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of malnutrition in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

This Prospective observational study was performed on COVID-19-positive patients under follow-up in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in North India. All patients were confirmed by nasal Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and/or COVID-19 pneumonia criteria on chest Computed Tomography (CT).

Ineligibility criteria included patients with a significant preexisting disease with hypoprotidemia (uncontrolled cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome), patients established on Home Enteral Nutrition (HEN) or Parenteral Nutrition (PN) in an acute setting (e.g., hospitalized). Overall, 282 patients were included in the analysis. The institutional Biomedical Research Ethics Committee approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) age > 18 years, (2) SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia (confirmed by RT-PCR, (3) hospitalization in wards or ICU, (4) without end-of-life decisions.

Study period: Data was collected over a period of 6 months that is from May 2021 to October 2021.

Demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory values: Patient details were extracted from the records of the COVID-19 control center of the tertiary healthcare center, and these patients who tested positive were the eligible participants; they were called up for enrolment to record the data.

Eligible participants will be enrolled consecutively in the study. The demographic profile was recorded in the Case Record Form generated by Google forms online in terms of age, gender, residence, contact information, and symptoms experienced (Cold, Fever, Cough, Shortness of breath, Headache, Muscle pain, Sore throat, Diarrhoea, Olfactory disorders, Taste disorders, Exhaustion, Body ache, Weakness) [4,5].

History of chronic illness was noted along with the medication or treatment being administered to the patient. Pregnancy status and stage of gestation was asked. Smoking and alcohol intake information was collected. Blood test reports were extracted from records or discharge sheets, including inflammatory markers, D-dimer, albumin, and blood count (hemoglobin and lymphocyte count). Radiological findings were also extracted from the discharge sheet.

Socio-demographic profile: The socio-demographic profile will be assessed using the modified Kuppuswany Scale [4], and other parameters like the location of residence and the number of people living in house to the ratio of room available in house were asked.

Anthropometric measurement: BMI and other anthropometric measurements and measured as per the standard measurement guidelines [6]. Body height (± 0.1 cm) and weight (± 0.1 kg) in light indoor clothing were measured. Body mass index (kg/m2) was calculated. The average of left and right-side measurements was considered for analysis for midarm circumference, triceps skin-fold thickness, and calf circumference.

Nutritional assessment: Mini Nutritional Assessment scale, which consisted of 18 questions, was used. Questionnaire assessments were completed through face-to-face interviews and were performed by the staff trained well in formal nutrition surveys. Nutritional status was assessed considering the following cut-off points:<17 points (malnutrition), 17-23.5 points (risk of malnutrition), and 24-30 points (non-malnutrition).

Statistical analysis: Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD. Categorical variables were expressed as absolute values and percentages.

Results

112 men and 170 women were included, with a median age of 32 (IQR 25.0–46.0) years. The average MNA score across the population was 20.5 (SD ± 3.7). According to the data, 21.5% (n=60) were malnourished, 62.5% (n=177) were at risk of malnutrition and 15.9% (n=45) were adequately nourished. The average BMI was 23.3 kg/m2 and 39.1% of patients experienced weight loss. The basic demographic, comorbidities, anthropometry, and laboratory values of all enrolled patients showed in Table 1.

Clinical features
Characteristics  
Gender (%)  
Male 39.7
Female 60.3
Age (in years) 36.4 (SD ± 15.8)
Geographic Area (%)  
Rural 16.7 (n=47)
Urban 73.7 (n=208)
Semi-urban 9.6 (n=27)
Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m2) 23.3(SD ± 3.5)
Mid-Arm Circumference  
MAC less than 21 (%) 6 (n=17)
MAC 21 to 22 (%) 58.5 (n=165)
MAC greater than 22 (%) 35.5 (n=100)
Calf circumference (cm)  
CC less than 31 51.7 (n=146)
CC 31 or greater 48.2 (n=136)
m-Kuppuswamy score 19.7 (SD ± 6.7)
MNA Score (%)  
Normal nutritional status (24-30) 21.2 (n=60)
 Risk of malnutrition (17-23.5) 62.5 (n=177)
 Malnourished (<17) 15.9 (n=45)
Elevated inflammatory markers (%) 32.6 (n=92)
Lymphopenia confirmed (%) 18.8 (n=53)
RT-PCR confirmed (%) 97.8 (n=276)
Weight loss during the last 3 months (%)  
Weight loss greater than 3kg (6.6lbs) 3.5 (n=10)
Does not know the amount of weight loss 22.7 (n=64)
Weight loss between 1 and 3 kg (2.2 and 6.6 lbs) 12.8 (n=36)
No weight loss 60.9 (n=172)

Discussion

At the end of 2019, a new coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2 appeared in Wuhan, China. It was responsible for the emergence of a new acute respiratory infection now known as "COVID-19". It was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020 [7]. The present study aimed to assess nutritional status in patients who recovered from Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) using a nutritional assessment tool that can further impart practical and clinical indications for managing patients suffering from nutritional deficiency after recovering from COVID-19.

Our study has shown that malnutrition was highly prevalent in patients who recovered from COVID-19. Based on low BMI and/or weight loss, Malnutrition was present in 39.1% of patients. On the Mini Nutritional Assessment scale, malnutrition risk was moderate in 62.5% and severe in 21.2% of patients. Furthermore, we also assessed those patients who suffered serious COVID-19 and had severe malnutrition. The European Society of Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition (ESPEN) recommended management of COVID-19 patients for prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malnutrition to improve short- and long-term prognoses [8]. However, studies available with us have significantly focused only on hospitalized patients or those critically ill. Our study included participants with a larger spectrum of disease severity and a broader population range which may have implications for improving nutritional status and thereby immune functioning and consequently reducing the risk for COVID-19 infection.

The incidence of malnutrition in patients with COVID19 was higher. One of the reasons is that the acute inflammatory response of neo-coronavirus infection consumes the protein that makes up muscles. C-reactive protein, ferritin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin family factors, etc., were the inflammatory indicators that were generally increased. [8]. The synthesis of these acute-phase proteins required the consumption of albumin and even muscle protein [9]. This explanation is congruous with the observations of our study as the patient's calf circumference, and albumin levels were significantly lower. Similarly, hypoalbuminemia and low calf circumference were commonly used as important indicators for evaluating malnutrition [10,11]. Gastrointestinal symptoms caused by SARS-CoV-2 exacerbated malnutrition in patients. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 was also highly expressed in the gastrointestinal track [12]. So, the gastrointestinal tract was also the main target of SARS-CoV-2 attack [13,14]. Diarrhoea, mild abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, poor appetite, and other symptoms were widespread [15]. The involvement of the digestive tract had accelerated the occurrence of malnutrition in patients with COVID-19. It was also observed that most of patients suffered symptoms of anxiety due to fear of COVID-19 infection spread which resulted in the poor appetite of the patients which was also related to the patient's anxiety [16].

Blessedly, the number of COVID-19 cases has decreased in India, but when the data was being collected, a lot of cases and healthcare workers were dealing with work overload. Due to this reason, we were not able to record some of the baseline data for some patients. Our study didn't include patients who were critically ill or lost their lives due to COVID-19. We were not able to follow up and assess the treatment provided to patients suffering from severe malnutrition, whom we referred to a physician or dietician.

Conclusion

In our population, 62.5% were at risk of malnutrition and about 21.2% had severe nutritional risk. It was observed that due to pathological and psychological reasons, food intake was reduced in patients recovering from COVID-19. We need to implement better strategies to improve the nutritional status of all classes of society for a better prognosis of COVID-19 infection.

Ethical approval

An institutional ethical approval was obtained before the commencement of the study (BREC/21/66; dated 20.08.2021).

Declaration of interest

No financial or nonfinancial benefits have been received or will be received from any party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Dr. Ramesh Verma and the Department of Community Medicine, Pt B D Sharma Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, for helping to assess data statistics in the project.

Funding

There was no funding involved in the research.

Author contribution

MS, RK, SKR: Concept and design of the study; MS, RK, AC, DY, PKS: data collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, MS, RS: drafting the manuscript and review of literature; MS: Clinicianin- charge, critical review of the manuscript for intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and will act as guarantor for the paper. All authors approve of the final version.

References

open access journals, open access scientific research publisher, open access publisher
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Flyer image

Share This Article